From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Renzo

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-209193 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-209193 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-450

12-11-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Robert Renzo, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Oconee County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Renzo

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 11, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-209193 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Renzo

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Robert Renzo, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2012-209193 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)