From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rennie

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 14, 2021
2021 N.D. 66 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

No. 20200307

04-14-2021

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah Rennie, Defendant and Appellant

Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor. [¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16, N.D.R.Crim.P., discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie's motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Rennie

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 14, 2021
2021 N.D. 66 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Rennie

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah Rennie…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Apr 14, 2021

Citations

2021 N.D. 66 (N.D. 2021)
958 N.W.2d 142