From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Renfro

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 6, 2006
142 P.3d 122 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. CR030945; A126425.

Submitted on record and briefs July 7, 2006.

September 6, 2006.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Yamhill County. Ronald W. Stone, Judge.

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Ernest G. Lannet, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Seann C. Colgan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005), and assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence of possession of methamphetamine. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained through exploitation of an unlawful stop in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state's concession.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Renfro

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 6, 2006
142 P.3d 122 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Renfro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK ALVIN RENFRO III, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 6, 2006

Citations

142 P.3d 122 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
142 P.3d 122