From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reliford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1990
568 So. 2d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-474.

October 23, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Roy T. Gelber, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.


The trial court failed to give written reasons for a downward departure of sentence after an admission of violation of previously imposed community control. Following the dictates of Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990), we reverse with directions to give the defendant in the trial court the opportunity to either withdraw an admission of violation of community control, or be sentenced within the guidelines with no possibility of departure.

As we have previously done, we certify to the Supreme Court the question of whether or not Pope v. State, supra, should be applied retroactively.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

State v. Reliford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 23, 1990
568 So. 2d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Reliford

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. LEROY RELIFORD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 23, 1990

Citations

568 So. 2d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

State v. McCall

Because no written reasons were provided, on remand, the trial court must resentence within the guidelines.…

State v. Johnson

Nonetheless, the court in Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990), by reference to its earlier opinion in…