Opinion
No. 20210055
10-14-2021
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Barry Ryder REDDOG, Defendant and Appellant
Julie A. Lawyer, State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief. Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
Julie A. Lawyer, State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Barry Reddog appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of robbery with a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit felonious restraint. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte