From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 1967
199 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35924.

May 24, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 190 So.2d 340.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

John J. Duffy, Clearwater, for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 1967
199 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

State v. Reddick

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM REDDICK, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 24, 1967

Citations

199 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1967)