From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. R.D.H

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 25, 2000
779 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-1999

Opinion filed October 25, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Peter Ramsberger, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


The State appeals from the trial court's order withholding adjudication of delinquency because the trial court failed to suspend R.D.H.'s driver's license, contrary to the requirements of section 322.056(1), Florida Statutes (1997). R.D.H. entered a no contest plea to the delinquent act of possession of marijuana, a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1997), and an enumerated offense under section 322.056(1). The trial court accepted the plea, withheld adjudication, and directed that R.D.H. complete the Juvenile Arbitration Drug Court Program.

This court has held that even when the trial court accepts a no contest plea and withholds adjudication, section 322.056(1) mandates that the trial court suspend the juvenile's driver's license. See State v. J.V.W., 739 So.2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Thus, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for the trial court to suspend R.D.H.'s license in accordance with the requirements of section 322.056(1).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

State v. R.D.H

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 25, 2000
779 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. R.D.H

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. R.D.H., a minor, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 25, 2000

Citations

779 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. S.S

Section 322.056(1) mandates suspension when a no contest plea is entered, adjudication is withheld, and the…