From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Raynor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 21, 2017
327 Conn. 969 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

11-21-2017

STATE of Connecticut v. James RAYNOR

Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 409, 167 A.3d 1076 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record's failure to indicate the racial composition of the venire or the empaneled jury rendered the record inadequate for review of the defendant's claim under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) ?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Raynor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 21, 2017
327 Conn. 969 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Raynor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. James RAYNOR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 21, 2017

Citations

327 Conn. 969 (Conn. 2017)
173 A.3d 952

Citing Cases

State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

Although accessorial liability for an assault cannot be based solely on a person's presence at the scene, if…

State v. Raynor

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…