From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ratteray

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Sep 25, 2013
837 N.W.2d 159 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20120446.

2013-09-25

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Ashley RATTERAY, Jr., Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge. Lee M. Grossman, State's Attorney, Valley City, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. Thomas M. Jackson, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge.
Lee M. Grossman, State's Attorney, Valley City, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. Thomas M. Jackson, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.
PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Christopher Ratteray appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of creation of sexually expressive images. Ratteray argues there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions. He also claims his sentence is excessive and was based on impermissible factors. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35 .1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Ratteray

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Sep 25, 2013
837 N.W.2d 159 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Ratteray

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Ashley…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

837 N.W.2d 159 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 162