From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Raphael

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 7, 2017
895 N.W.2d 314 (N.D. 2017)

Opinion

No. 20160447

06-07-2017

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Roxanne Racquel Raphael, Defendant and Appellant

Ladd R. Erickson, State's Attorney, Washburn, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ladd R. Erickson, State's Attorney, Washburn, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Roxanne Raphael appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted her of possession of a controlled substance. Raphael argues the jury's verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner


Summaries of

State v. Raphael

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 7, 2017
895 N.W.2d 314 (N.D. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Raphael

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Roxanne Racquel Raphael…

Court:SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Jun 7, 2017

Citations

895 N.W.2d 314 (N.D. 2017)
2017 N.D. 131