From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 17, 2022
No. 03-22-00221-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00221-CR

06-17-2022

The State of Texas, Appellant v. Sotero Hector Ramirez, Appellee


Do Not Publish

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY NO. 46, 965, THE HONORABLE BARBARA MOLINA, JUDGE PRESIDING

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The State appeals from the trial court's pre-trial order granting Sotero Hector Ramirez's motion to suppress certain evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. 44.01(a)(5). The State has now filed a motion to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that "upon the request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential findings," which the court defined as "findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate court with a basis upon which to review the trial court's application of the law to the facts." State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Those findings must be "adequate and complete, covering every potentially dispositive issue that might reasonably be said to have arisen in the course of the suppression proceedings," State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 676 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011), including "explicit credibility determination[s]" regarding the witnesses who testified at the suppression hearing, State v. Mendoza, 365 S.W.3d 666, 673 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). When a trial court fails to make such findings of fact and conclusions of law, we are authorized to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of "essential findings." See Elias, 339 S.W.3d at 677 (citing Tex.R.App.P. 44.4).

Before filing its notice of appeal, the State filed a request for the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law related to its ruling on Ramirez's motion to suppress. The record before us does not contain findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, we grant the State's motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court so that it may enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. A supplemental clerk's record containing those findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed with this Court no later than July 18, 2022. This appeal will be reinstated once the supplemental clerk's record is filed.

It is so ordered.

Abated and Remanded


Summaries of

State v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 17, 2022
No. 03-22-00221-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:The State of Texas, Appellant v. Sotero Hector Ramirez, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00221-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 17, 2022)