From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. R. R. M. (In re R. R. M.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Mar 31, 2021
310 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A174454

03-31-2021

In the MATTER OF R. R. M., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. R. R. M., Appellant.

Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to advise her of her right pursuant to ORS 426.100(1) to subpoena witnesses. The state concedes the error. We agree and accept the concession. As we have held in numerous cases, failure to provide such statutory advice of rights constitutes plain error. See generally State v. B. O. , 276 Or. App. 604, 605, 368 P.3d 82 (2016) (citing cases). Given the nature of civil commitment proceedings, the relative interests of the parties, the gravity of the error, and the ends of justice, we exercise discretion to correct the error.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. R. R. M. (In re R. R. M.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Mar 31, 2021
310 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. R. R. M. (In re R. R. M.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of R. R. M., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

310 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
484 P.3d 408

Citing Cases

State v. Y. R . (In re Y. R.)

Failure to provide the statutory advice of rights constitutes plain error. See State v. R. R. M., 310 …

State v. C. K. (In re C. K.)

We agree that failure to provide such statutory advice of rights constitutes plain error. See State v. R. R.…