From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. R. M. S. (In re R. M. S.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Oct 2, 2024
335 Or. App. 337 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

A181940

10-02-2024

In the Matter of R. M. S., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. v. R. M. S., Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent,

Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc. filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Submitted July 24, 2024

Clackamas County Circuit Court 23CC04431; Kathie F. Steele, Judge.

Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc. filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Joyce, Judge.

JOYCE, J.

The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days after finding that she suffered from a mental illness that caused her to be a danger to herself and others. On appeal, appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's conclusion that she was a danger to herself and to others. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the civil commitment, particularly on the ground that appellant is a danger to others.

Appellant additionally argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for an in-person hearing at the hospital, instead allowing witnesses to appear remotely. That claim of error is controlled by our recent decision in State v. A. M, 333 Or.App. 453, 553 P.3d 593, adh'd to on recons,___Or App___,___P.3d___(2024). For the reasons stated in that case, we remand for a hearing to establish a factual record about whether the remote format satisfies due process and to permit the trial court to rule on that issue in the first instance.

Vacated and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. R. M. S. (In re R. M. S.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Oct 2, 2024
335 Or. App. 337 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

State v. R. M. S. (In re R. M. S.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of R. M. S., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. v. R…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

335 Or. App. 337 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)