From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. R. D. (In re R. D.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon
May 8, 2024
332 Or. App. 562 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

A180596

05-08-2024

In the Matter of R. D., a Person Alleged to have Intellectual Disabilities. v. R. D., Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent,

Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., fled the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, fled the brief for respondent.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Submitted March 20, 2024.

Marion County Circuit Court 22CC07136; Jennifer J. Brown, Judge pro tempore.

Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., fled the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, fled the brief for respondent.

Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. M. M.-B., 332 Or.App. 500, __ P.3d __ (May 8, 2024).


Summaries of

State v. R. D. (In re R. D.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon
May 8, 2024
332 Or. App. 562 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

State v. R. D. (In re R. D.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of R. D., a Person Alleged to have Intellectual…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

332 Or. App. 562 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)