The opinion of the Appellate Court sets forth the following facts that the jury reasonably could have found. See State v. Qayyum , 201 Conn. App. 864, 866–67, 875, 242 A.3d 500 (2020). "On April 12, 2017, Torrington Police Officer Matthew Faulkner went to 356 Migeon Avenue in Torrington to execute a search warrant following his investigation regarding possible drug sales being conducted from unit 1 North, the apartment of Oscar Pugh.
Accordingly, this claim is unpreserved, and we decline to review it. See, e.g., State v. Qayyum , 201 Conn. App. 864, 872 n.2, 242 A.3d 500 (2020), aff'd, 344 Conn. 302, 279 A.3d 172 (2022). Furthermore, the defendant cannot obtain review of his unpreserved evidentiary claim by labeling it with a constitutional tag.
We note that, although the plaintiff did not raise the preservation issue in its brief to this court, we are not precluded from doing so. See, e.g., State v. Qayyum , 201 Conn. App. 864, 872 n.2, 879 n.3, 242 A.3d 500 (2020) (observing that defendant failed to properly preserve claims on appeal even though state had not raised preservation issue), aff'd, 344 Conn. 302, 279 A.3d 172 (2022). We are particularly unwilling to review this unpreserved claim because its resolution appears to raise at least one significant factual question.
Linda F. Currie-Zeffiro, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition. The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 201 Conn. App. 864, 242 A.3d 500, is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly admitted evidence of the defendant's lack of income?