Accordingly, this claim is unpreserved, and we decline to review it. See, e.g., State v. Qayyum , 201 Conn. App. 864, 872 n.2, 242 A.3d 500 (2020), aff'd, 344 Conn. 302, 279 A.3d 172 (2022). Furthermore, the defendant cannot obtain review of his unpreserved evidentiary claim by labeling it with a constitutional tag.
(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Qayyum , 344 Conn. 302, 310–11, 279 A.3d 172 (2022).