State v. Qayyum

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Griffin

    220 Conn. App. 225 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Accordingly, this claim is unpreserved, and we decline to review it. See, e.g., State v. Qayyum , 201 Conn. App. 864, 872 n.2, 242 A.3d 500 (2020), aff'd, 344 Conn. 302, 279 A.3d 172 (2022). Furthermore, the defendant cannot obtain review of his unpreserved evidentiary claim by labeling it with a constitutional tag.

  2. R. H. v. M. H.

    219 Conn. App. 716 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)   Cited 3 times
    In R.H. v. M.H., 296 A.3d 243, 250 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023), the Connecticut Court of Appeals was confronted with a similar scenario in which a circuit court ordered supervised visitation for the mother in that case, but delegated authority to the father to determine whether and when she would be permitted unsupervised visitation.

    (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Qayyum , 344 Conn. 302, 310–11, 279 A.3d 172 (2022).