From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Qayyum

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 26, 2021
336 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

01-26-2021

STATE of Connecticut v. Muhammad A. QAYYUM

Robert L. O'Brien, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Linda F. Currie-Zeffiro, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Robert L. O'Brien, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Linda F. Currie-Zeffiro, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 201 Conn. App. 864, 242 A.3d 500, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly admitted evidence of the defendant's lack of income?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had not abused its discretion in permitting expert testimony regarding the defendant's intent to sell narcotics?"


Summaries of

State v. Qayyum

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 26, 2021
336 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Qayyum

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Muhammad A. QAYYUM

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 26, 2021

Citations

336 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2021)
244 A.3d 562

Citing Cases

State v. Qayyum

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: (1) "Did…