From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Provencher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 4, 1988
536 A.2d 1123 (Me. 1988)

Opinion

Argued November 17, 1987.

Decided February 4, 1988.

Appeal from the Appeal from Superior Court, York County.

Mary Tousignant, Dist. Atty., Anne Jordan, (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Alfred, for plaintiff.

Thomas VanHouten (orally), Wood VanHouten, Sanford, for defendant.

Before NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

By his appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court (York County) of trafficking in cocaine, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103, the Defendant, Richard Provencher, asserts for the first time that the court erred in its instructions on entrapment and in not ordering a pre-sentence investigation and report as a prerequisite to his sentencing.

Our review of the record discloses the instruction was proper, State v. Turner, 495 A.2d 1211, 1213 (Me. 1985), and the court did not err in determining not to order a pre-sentence investigation and report. M.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Provencher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 4, 1988
536 A.2d 1123 (Me. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Provencher

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Richard PROVENCHER

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Feb 4, 1988

Citations

536 A.2d 1123 (Me. 1988)