From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Prosser

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 13, 2004
131 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82786

April 13, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable David Lee Vincent III.

Andrea K. Spillars Assistant Attorney General Patrick T. Morgan Jefferson City, MO.

Christopher Prosser Pacific, MO, Appellant acting Pro Se.

Before Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Defendant appeals pro se the judgment denying his Rule 29.05 motion, filed on March 14, 2003, to reduce as excessive the sentence he received in 1992 on his conviction of second-degree murder. The trial court dismissed the motion on the grounds it lacked jurisdiction.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify defendant's sentence under Rule 29.05 after it filed its sentence on December 4, 1992. State v. Van Sickel, 726 S.W.2d 392, 393 (Mo.App. 1987).

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Prosser

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 13, 2004
131 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Prosser

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER PROSSER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 13, 2004

Citations

131 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

State v. Bryant

State v. Vidal, 843 S.W.2d 392, 393 (Mo.App. 1992) (where defendant's conviction resulted from a guilty plea…