Summary
In State v. Proctor, No. 18-0898, 2019 WL 2524268, at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. June 19, 2019), we held similar evasive conduct was sufficient evidence that a defendant knew the vehicle he was driving was stolen.
Summary of this case from State v. AzureOpinion
No. 18-0898
06-19-2019
STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brandon Samuel PROCTOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Christopher J. Roth of Forney Roth, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904
Defendant appeals his convictions of first-degree theft, eluding, driving while barred, trespass, and criminal mischief. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.