From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Proctor

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jun 19, 2019
928 N.W.2d 907 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

Summary

In State v. Proctor, No. 18-0898, 2019 WL 2524268, at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. June 19, 2019), we held similar evasive conduct was sufficient evidence that a defendant knew the vehicle he was driving was stolen.

Summary of this case from State v. Azure

Opinion

No. 18-0898

06-19-2019

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brandon Samuel PROCTOR, Defendant-Appellant.

Christopher J. Roth of Forney Roth, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

Defendant appeals his convictions of first-degree theft, eluding, driving while barred, trespass, and criminal mischief. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. Proctor

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jun 19, 2019
928 N.W.2d 907 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

In State v. Proctor, No. 18-0898, 2019 WL 2524268, at *3 (Iowa Ct. App. June 19, 2019), we held similar evasive conduct was sufficient evidence that a defendant knew the vehicle he was driving was stolen.

Summary of this case from State v. Azure
Case details for

State v. Proctor

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRANDON SAMUEL PROCTOR…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jun 19, 2019

Citations

928 N.W.2d 907 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. Azure

SeeState v. Wilson , 878 N.W.2d 203, 211, 215 (Iowa 2016) (noting "that the act of avoiding law enforcement…