Opinion
Docket No. 42419 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 387
03-03-2015
STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RYAN ALLEN PROCTOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Christopher S. Nye, District Judge. Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge PER CURIAM
Ryan Allen Proctor pled guilty to felony injury to a child. I.C. § 18-1501(1). The district court sentenced Proctor to a unified term of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. The district court retained jurisdiction, and Proctor was sent to participate in the rider program.
After Proctor completed his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction. Proctor appeals, claiming his sentence is excessive and constitutes an abuse of discretion.
Sentences are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Our appellate standard of review and the factors to be considered when evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well- established. State v. Burdett, 134 Idaho 271, 1 P.3d 299 (Ct. App. 2000); State v. Sanchez, 115 Idaho 776, 769 P.2d 1148 (Ct. App. 1989); State v. Reinke, 103 Idaho 771, 653 P.2d 1183 (Ct. App. 1982); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007).
The record does not indicate that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing. Therefore, the order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and Proctor's sentence are affirmed.