The revision to § 6-11 did not go into effect until February 1, 2018, subsequent to the conclusion of the trial in the present case on December 10, 2015. Thus, this issue is governed by the unmodified constancy of accusation doctrine as it existed prior to Daniel W. E. See, e.g., State v. Daniel W. E. , supra, at 630, 142 A.3d 265 ; State v. Prince A ., 196 Conn. App. 413, 418–19, 229 A.3d 1213, cert. denied, 335 Conn. 949, 238 A.3d 20 (2020).
Melissa Patterson, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 196 Conn. App. 413, 229 A.3d 1213 (2020), is denied.
(Citations omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Prince A. , 196 Conn. App. 413, 417–19, 229 A.3d 1213, cert. denied, 335 Conn. 949, 238 A.3d 20 (2020). The defendant's claim of plain error regarding the admission of the testimony of the victim's mother warrants only a brief discussion.