From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Preiskel

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 144 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Argued May 25, 1936 —

Decided October 2, 1936.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 736.

For the plaintiff in error, James D. Carpenter, Jr.

For the defendants in error, Ward McGinnis and R. Lewis Kennedy.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 6.

For reversal — CASE, HEHER, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 4.


Summaries of

State v. Preiskel

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 144 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

State v. Preiskel

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ABRAM PREISKEL ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1936

Citations

187 A. 144 (N.J. 1936)
187 A. 144

Citing Cases

State v. Jenkins

The same principle is implicit in the recent decision of our Court of Errors and Appeals in State v. Morano,…

State v. Ellenstein

In view of the close identity in the duties charged against them, and in the responsibilities, where a duty…