From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 8, 1996
669 So. 2d 413 (La. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-KD-0282

March 8, 1996

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. "E" Number 377-323


Granted. The trial court erred in reaching the constitutionality of New Orleans Municipal Code Sec. 42-96 in the contest of the motion to suppress. Courts should not pass on the constitutionality of legislation unless it is essential to the decision of the case. White v. West Carroll Hosp., 613 So.2d 150 (La. 1992). In the instant case, the question raised in the motion to suppress was not whether the ordinance was constitutional, but whether police had a valid basis to stop defendant based on the ordinance. Statutes are presumed to be constitutional. Lakeside Imports, Inc. v. State 94-0191 (La. 7/5/94), 639 So.2d 253. Since the ordinance does not appear unconstitutional on its face, we conclude the officers were in good faith in making the stop based on a presumptively valid ordinance. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court suppressing the evidence based on a finding that New Orleans Municipal Code Sec. 42-96 is unconstitutional is vacated and set aside. Case remanded to the trial court to rule on the merits of the motion to suppress.

WFM

PFC

JCW

HTL

CDK

BJJ

JPV


Summaries of

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 8, 1996
669 So. 2d 413 (La. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. AUBREY POWELL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 8, 1996

Citations

669 So. 2d 413 (La. 1996)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Roemer

Generally speaking, statutes are presumed to be constitutional. State v. Powell, 96-0282 (La. 3/8/96); 669…