From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pizarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 2007
36 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2000-01246.

January 30, 2007.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 30, 2002 (People v Pizarro, 297 AD2d 826), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 5, 2000.

Christian Pizarro, Wilton, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

State v. Pizarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 2007
36 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Pizarro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTIAN PIZARRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 684
827 N.Y.S.2d 666