From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 22, 1967
224 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio 1967)

Opinion

No. 40247

Decided March 22, 1967.

Criminal law — Indictment — Charge of obtaining "money" by fraud — Evidence tending to prove "check" obtained by fraud — Failure of proof.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County.

The defendant, Pittman, appellant herein, was indicted for unlawfully obtaining "possession and title of certain money in the amount and value of seventy-two and 50/100 dollars ($72.50), the property of Glen J. Liebherr, with the consent of the said Glen J. Liebherr, induced by false and fraudulent representations, pretense, token and writing."

The defendant pleaded not guilty and was tried to a jury, found guilty as charged in the indictment, and sentenced.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court.

The allowance of a motion for leave to appeal brings the cause to this court for review.

Mr. Harry Friberg, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Jos. J. Jan, for appellee.

Mr. Jude F. Sutter, for appellant.


The indictment charges that money was obtained in the amount of $72.50. The evidence tended to prove that the thing obtained was a check for $72.50. "Money" and "check" are not synonymous. The state failed to prove the charge in the indictment. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 22, 1967
224 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio 1967)
Case details for

State v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. PITTMAN, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 22, 1967

Citations

224 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio 1967)
224 N.E.2d 913

Citing Cases

People v. Lyndell Robinson

In the case before us, however, the defendant is charged with attempt, not the completed offense. It is the…

United States v. Fernando

Second, state courts have interpreted "money" in somewhat analogous criminal statutes as not including…