From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pittman

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Aug 19, 2019
9 Wn. App. 2d 1101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

79056-1-I

08-19-2019

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. STEVEN GUY PITTMAN, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Steven Pittman appeals the DNA fee imposed as part of his sentence for unlawful possession of methamphetamine and unlawful use of a building for drug purposes. He contends, and the State concedes, that the DNA fee must be stricken under RCW 43.43.7541 and State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) because he previously gave a DNA sample that is on file with the Washington State Patrol crime lab. We accept the concession of error and remand with directions to strike the DNA fee from the judgment and sentence.


Summaries of

State v. Pittman

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Aug 19, 2019
9 Wn. App. 2d 1101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. STEVEN GUY PITTMAN, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Aug 19, 2019

Citations

9 Wn. App. 2d 1101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)
9 Wash. App. 2d 1101