From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pitchford

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
May 12, 2014
No. 70407-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. May. 12, 2014)

Opinion

70407-9-I

05-12-2014

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DONALD EARL PITCHFORD, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Per Curiam

Donald Pitchford appeals from the exceptional sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of second degree assault with a deadly weapon. The State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in doubling the deadly weapon sentence enhancement based on a 1984 conviction. See RCW 9.94A.533(4).

The State asserts that on remand "it is within the trial court's discretion to revisit all aspects of Pitchford's sentence." Because the State cites no relevant authority to support this claim, we remand solely to permit the trial court to strike the unlawful portion of the deadly weapon enhancement.

Remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Pitchford

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
May 12, 2014
No. 70407-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. May. 12, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Pitchford

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DONALD EARL PITCHFORD, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: May 12, 2014

Citations

No. 70407-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. May. 12, 2014)