State v. Soeun Kim Pin

4 Citing cases

  1. State v. Miller

    787 A.2d 639 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)   Cited 8 times

    We note that whether article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution provides greater protection than the federal constitution for involuntary confessions is an open question. See, e.g., State v. Pin, 56 Conn. App. 549, 555-56, 745 A.2d 204, cert. denied, 252 Conn. 951, 748 A.2d 299 (2000) (citing four cases from our Supreme Court dating from 1987). All of these arguments suffer from the same infirmity. Despite the defendant's assertion to us at oral argument that he raised the pretext argument "implicitly" at the trial level, we conclude that he raised this claim for the first time before this court.

  2. State v. Soeun Kim Pin

    252 Conn. 951 (Conn. 2000)   Cited 1 times

    Decided March 22, 2000 The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 549 (AC 18644), is denied. Judith M. Wildfeuer, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

  3. State v. Lewis

    60 Conn. App. 219 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000)   Cited 19 times
    Recognizing that to determine whether a defendant's constitutional rights have been infringed, appellate court must review record in entirety and not just evidence before trial court at time of ruling, but finding it significant that defendant never asked trial court to reconsider findings made at suppression hearing in light of trial testimony

    " (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pin, 56 Conn. App. 549, 556-57, 745 A.2d 204, cert. denied, 252 Conn. 951, 748 A.2d 299 (2000). "In order to be voluntary a confession must be the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by the maker. . . . If it is not, if his will has been overborne and his capacity for self-determination critically impaired, the use of the confession offends due process. . . . The determination of whether a confession is voluntary must be based on a consideration of the totality of circumstances surrounding it . . . including both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation. . . . Factors that may be taken into account, upon a proper factual showing, include: the youth of the accused; his lack of education; his intelligence; the lack of any advice as to his constitutional rights; the length of detention; the repeated and prolonged nature of the questioning; and the use of physical punishment, such as the deprivation of food and sleep."

  4. State v. Banks

    58 Conn. App. 603 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000)   Cited 17 times

    " (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pin, 56 Conn. App. 549, 556-57, 745 A.2d 204, cert. denied, 252 Conn. 951, 748 A.2d 299 (2000). "In order to be voluntary a confession must be the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by the maker. . . . If it is not, if his will has been overborne and his capacity for self-determination critically impaired, the use of the confession offends due process. . . . The determination of whether a confession is voluntary must be based on a consideration of the totality of circumstances surrounding it . . . . Factors that may be taken into account . . . include: the youth of the accused; his lack of education; his intelligence; the lack of any advice as to his constitutional rights; the length of detention; the repeated and prolonged nature of the questioning; and the use of physical punishment, such as the deprivation of food and sleep."