From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pierre

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2013
60 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-3

STATE of Connecticut v. Clerde PIERRE.

Kirstin B. Coffin, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Kirstin B. Coffin, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 139 Conn.App. 116, 54 A.3d 1060, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly denied the defendant's motion to suppress the gun and marijuana found in a warrantless search of an attic storage area of the rooming house wherein the defendant resided?

“2. If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is the claim that the defendant's statement to the police was fruit of the poisonous tree reviewable?

“3. If the answer to the second question is in the affirmative, should the defendant's statement to the police have been suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree?”


Summaries of

State v. Pierre

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 3, 2013
60 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Pierre

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Clerde PIERRE.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

60 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2013)
307 Conn. 947

Citing Cases

State v. Pierre

Id., at 127–28, 54 A.3d 1060. We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal on the…

State v. Pierre

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal on the following issues: (1) "Did the…