From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pickett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1886
94 N.C. 971 (N.C. 1886)

Opinion

(February Term, 1886.)

Where a defendant, convicted of larceny, escaped pending the appeal, the appeal will not be dismissed, but will be continued, to be called up for argument either by the prisoner or the State, when he shall be re-taken.

MOTION by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal, heard at February Term, 1886, of the Supreme Court.

Attorney General, for the State.

Mr. John D. Shaw, for the defendant.


The defendant was convicted at January Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of ROBESON County, before MacRae, Judge, of the crime of larceny, and pending his appeal, escaped from custody.

The appeal was continued from Term to Term in this Court, until February Term, 1886, when the State moved to dismiss it.


For the purpose of the motion to dismiss this appeal, this (972) case is in all material respects like that of State v. McMillian, ante, 945, except that the appellant here was convicted of the crime of larceny. We think what we said in that case, applies to, and embraces one like this. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be denied.

Motion denied.

Cited: S. v. Jacobs, 107 N.C. 777.


Summaries of

State v. Pickett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1886
94 N.C. 971 (N.C. 1886)
Case details for

State v. Pickett

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. OSCAR PICKETT

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1886

Citations

94 N.C. 971 (N.C. 1886)

Citing Cases

State v. Jacobs

In our case the judgment of the court below was affirmed here, and the Governor issued the death warrant by…

Horah v. Knox

No error. Affirmed. Cited: Wessell v. Rathjohn, 89 N.C. 383; McRae v. Malloy, 9 N.C. 160; Holly v. Holly, 94…