Further, as noted by the State, the defendant's failure to report his stalking arrest alone is sufficient to justify the trial court's diversion revocation. See State v. Jeret Tyrone Phillips, No. E2001-00987-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 256736, at *5 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 22, 2002). Again, the defendant is not entitled to relief.

In this case, insufficiencies in the trial court's findings, if any, are rendered harmless in light of the probation revocation order, the appellant's admission of not reporting to his probation officer, appellant's garnering a new arrest, and the specifications of the charges. See State v. Phillips, No. E2001-00987- CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 256736, at *5 (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 22, 2002) (finding harmless error when failure to report arrests as required, which was charged and proven, would be sufficient to justify defendant's probation revocation). We hold that any error involving a substantial right did not affect the judgment or result in prejudice to the judicial process.