From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Phillips

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jun 22, 2020
No. 80549-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 22, 2020)

Opinion

80549-5-I

06-22-2020

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MARIAH LESHAY PHILLIPS, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM

Mariah Phillips appeals the financial obligations imposed following her guilty plea to second degree murder. She contends, and the State concedes, that the court erred in imposing supervision fees because she is indigent, the fees are not mandatory, and the court expressly waived all nonmandatory financial obligations. Phillips's contention is supported by the record and the decisions in State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) and State v. Dillon, 12 Wn.App. 2d 133, 456 P.3d 1199 (2020) (where defendant is indigent and record demonstrates court's intent to waive nonmandatory financial obligations, boilerplate financial obligations should be stricken).

We accept the concession and remand with directions to strike the supervision fee from the judgment and sentence.


Summaries of

State v. Phillips

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jun 22, 2020
No. 80549-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 22, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MARIAH LESHAY PHILLIPS, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Jun 22, 2020

Citations

No. 80549-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jun. 22, 2020)