From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pettypool

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 15, 1984
676 P.2d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

42007; CA A28754

Submitted on record and briefs January 31, 1984

Appeal dismissed February 15, 1984

Appeal from Circuit Court, Benton County.

Frank D. Knight, Judge.

Steven W. Black and Black Elliott, Corvallis, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed.


The only error assigned on appeal is that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. That claim requires an evidentiary hearing and, except in extraordinary cases, may not be raised on direct appeal. State v. Chase, 51 Or. App. 289, 624 P.2d 1100 (1981). Because this is not such a case, the issue must be resolved by habeas corpus proceedings where, as here, defendant has not been convicted of a crime, ORS 138.510(1), but has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, and the court found that defendant would have been convicted of the crime if she had been found responsible.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Pettypool

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 15, 1984
676 P.2d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Pettypool

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GEORGIA PETTYPOOL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 15, 1984

Citations

676 P.2d 368 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
676 P.2d 368

Citing Cases

State v. McKarge

This issue is one that can only be resolved in a post-conviction proceeding where an evidentiary hearing may…

State v. England

These claims are more satisfactorily resolved through a habeas corpus proceeding, as many jurisdictions have…