State v. Petty

Full title: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Petty, Defendant/Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Dec 22, 2015

478 S.W.3d 549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102177

12-22-2015

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Petty, Defendant/Appellant.

Amy Elizabeth Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Rachel Sara Flaster, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorney for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Amy Elizabeth Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Rachel Sara Flaster, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorney for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Robert Petty appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000,¹ and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We affirm.

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).