From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Peterson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 30, 1996
921 S.W.2d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 66363, 68193.

April 30, 1996.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JUDGES.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Breck K. Burgess, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


A jury found defendant guilty of one count of first degree murder § 565.020.1, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action § 571.015.1, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of life without possibility of parole and life imprisonment.

On appeal defendant claims the trial court erred when it allowed the State to make improper comments during closing argument. Defendant also argues the motion court erred when it denied his Rule 29.15 motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We disagree and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16 (b) and 30.25 (b).


Summaries of

State v. Peterson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 30, 1996
921 S.W.2d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO PETERSON, APPELLANT. ANTONIO…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 30, 1996

Citations

921 S.W.2d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)