From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pescatore

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 1, 1987
105 N.J. 441 (N.J. 1987)

Summary

holding that defendant was barred from raising argument because a cross-appeal was not filed

Summary of this case from State v. Romero

Opinion

Argued March 17, 1987 —

Decided April 1, 1987.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Philip DeVencentes and Alfred C. Pescatore argued the cause for appellants ( Galantucci Patuto, attorneys for Rocco Pescatore; Alfred C. Pescatore, attorney for Carmroc Corp., etc.; Biagiotti Marino, attorneys for Carmen Pescatore).

Patricia E. Stern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 213 N.J. Super. 22 (1986).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Pescatore

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 1, 1987
105 N.J. 441 (N.J. 1987)

holding that defendant was barred from raising argument because a cross-appeal was not filed

Summary of this case from State v. Romero
Case details for

State v. Pescatore

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROCCO PESCATORE, CARMINE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 1, 1987

Citations

105 N.J. 441 (N.J. 1987)
522 A.2d 440

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

See State v. Wein, 80 N.J. 491, 404 A.2d 302 (1979). See also N.J.S.A. 2C:20-1h; State v. Altenburg, 223 N.J.…

State v. Ruiz

Other cases cited by the parties reinforce the importance of this language. See, e.g., Kennedy , 130 N.C.…