Opinion
Case No. 14 CA 15
10-23-2014
APPEARANCES: For Relator DAVID A. JOSEPH, SR., PRO SE A626391 Grafton Correctional Institution 2500 South Avon Beldon Road Grafton, OHio 44044 For Respondent No Appearance
JUDGES: Hon. John W. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Petition for Writ of Mandamus JUDGMENT: Dismissed APPEARANCES: For Relator DAVID A. JOSEPH, SR., PRO SE
A626391
Grafton Correctional Institution
2500 South Avon Beldon Road
Grafton, OHio 44044
For Respondent No Appearance Wise, P. J.
{¶1}. Relator, David A. Joseph, Sr., has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus requesting this Court cause the charges against him in the Perry County Court to be dismissed and expunged. He argues he has not received a speedy trial, and the charge should be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
{¶2}. For a writ of mandamus to issue, the relator must have a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, the respondent must be under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and relator must have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225.
{¶3}. Relator is an inmate at the Ohio Department of Corrections. He has not filed an affidavit listing all prior civil actions as required by R.C. 2969.25 which provides,
(A) At the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a government entity or employee, the inmate shall file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any state or federal court. The affidavit shall include all of the following for each of those civil actions or appeals:Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2969.25.
(1) A brief description of the nature of the civil action or appeal;
(2) The case name, case number, and the court in which the civil action or appeal was brought;
(3) The name of each party to the civil action or appeal;
The outcome of the civil action or appeal, including whether the court dismissed the civil action or appeal as frivolous or malicious under state or federal law or rule of court, whether the court made an award against the inmate or the inmate's counsel of record for frivolous conduct under section 2323.51 of the Revised Code, another statute, or a rule of court, and, if the court so dismissed the action or appeal or made an award of that nature, the date of the final order affirming the dismissal or award.
{¶4}. "The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory and failure to comply with them requires dismissal of an inmate's complaint. State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258, 259, 719 N.E.2d 544 (1999), citing State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 422, 696 N.E.2d 594 (1998). As held by the court of appeals, the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) must be filed at the time the complaint is filed, and an inmate may not cure the defect by later filings. Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-5533, 797 N.E.2d 982, ¶ 9 (an inmate's "belated attempt to file the required affidavit does not excuse his noncompliance. See R.C. 2969.25(A), which requires that the affidavit be filed '[a]t the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a government entity or employee.' [emphasis sic] )." State ex rel. Hall v. Mohr, 2014-Ohio-3735.
{¶5}. Because Relator did not file the required affidavit, we must dismiss the petition.
{¶6}. Even had we addressed the merits of the complaint, a claim for denial of speedy trial is not cognizable in an extraordinary-writ action. State ex rel. Barr v. Pittman, 2010-Ohio-4989, 127 Ohio St. 3d 32, 33, 936 N.E.2d 43.
{¶7}. Based upon the foregoing, this cause is dismissed. By: Wise, P. J. Delaney, J., and Baldwin, J., concur. JWW/d 0929