From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2007
44 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1692.

October 11, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered December 21, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Jung Park of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sullivan and Nardelli, JJ.


The record on appeal supports the trial court's determination that the disciplinary records of the undercover officer in this buy and bust case contained nothing that was "relevant and material" to defendant's case, and therefore we decline to review those records (Civil Rights Law § 50-a). Furthermore, defendant received a full opportunity to impeach the officer as to all matters affecting her credibility, and his Confrontation Clause claim is without merit ( see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679).


Summaries of

State v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2007
44 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PEREZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7522
843 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

People v. Murray

The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's repeated…

People v. Davis

Moreover, the Court is unpersuaded by the defendant's argument that this finding is material and relevant to…