From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pelzl

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jan 12, 2011
798 N.W.2d 878 (N.D. 2011)

Opinion

No. 20100227.

Decided January 12, 2011.

Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Ronald W. McBeth, Assistant State's Attorney, Law Enforcement Center, 413 3rd Ave. N., Wahpeton, N.D. 58075, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Jason M. Hastings (argued), Hastings Law, L.L.C., P.O. Box 196, Fergus Falls, Minn. 56538, for defendant and appellant.


[¶ 1] Daniel Pelzl appeals from the trial court's amended judgment revoking his probation. On appeal, Pelzl argues the trial court erred in revoking his probation because the probationary conditions set by the court were unrealistic. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). See, e.g., State v. McAvoy, 2007 ND 178, ¶¶ 9, 18, 741 N.W.2d 198 (holding the trial court's factual findings of a probation violation were not clearly erroneous and concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant's probation).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner


Summaries of

State v. Pelzl

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Jan 12, 2011
798 N.W.2d 878 (N.D. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Pelzl

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Daniel Scott Pelzl…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Jan 12, 2011

Citations

798 N.W.2d 878 (N.D. 2011)
2011 N.D. 3