From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Peebles

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 30, 1999
7 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75955.

November 30, 1999.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MARK D. SEIGEL, JUDGE.

N. Scott Rosenblum, Susan Kister, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before: RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.


ORDER


Casey Peebles (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following his jury convictions for second degree burglary, section 569.170, RSMo 1994, and misdemeanor stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 1997. On appeal, Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. Further, we find sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Dulany, 781 S.W.2d 52, 55 (Mo.banc 1989). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Peebles

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 30, 1999
7 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Peebles

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. CASEY PEEBLES, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Nov 30, 1999

Citations

7 S.W.3d 570 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)