From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Peay

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 7, 1977
374 A.2d 257 (Conn. 1977)

Opinion

George D. Stoughton, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Mary V. McCarthy, for the appellant (defendant).

Argued June 7, 1977

Decided June 7, 1977


It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his assignment of errors on or before June 27, 1977, the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Peay

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 7, 1977
374 A.2d 257 (Conn. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Peay

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILLIAM J. PEAY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 7, 1977

Citations

374 A.2d 257 (Conn. 1977)
173 Conn. 759