From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 19, 2013
108 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D12–2409.

2013-03-19

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alan Ray PAULK, Respondent.

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Brad King, State Attorney, and Brian Trehy, Assistant State Attorney, of Fifth Judicial Circuit, Inverness, for Petitioner. Michael R. Buchanan, of Dethomasis & Buchanan, P.A., Gainesville, for Respondent.


Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Brad King, State Attorney, and Brian Trehy, Assistant State Attorney, of Fifth Judicial Circuit, Inverness, for Petitioner. Michael R. Buchanan, of Dethomasis & Buchanan, P.A., Gainesville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, State of Florida, seeks certiorari review of an order rendered on June 14, 2012, requiring the State to produce certain materials that the State alleges will result in material harm if disclosed. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude that the order under review departs from the essential requirements of the law and results in material injustice. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988). We therefore quash the order under review and remand this case for further proceedings.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 19, 2013
108 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Paulk

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alan Ray PAULK, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

108 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)