From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pattioay

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
May 8, 2018
416 P.3d 936 (Haw. Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

rejecting the defendant's argument that the trial court erred in "fail[ing] to instruct on the knowing and negligent states of mind," where the jury was properly instructed as to the applicable states of mind for terroristic threatening in the first degree — intentionally or recklessly

Summary of this case from State v. Valoroso

Opinion

NO. CAAP-17-0000465

05-08-2018

STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthan PATTIOAY, Defendant-Appellant

On the briefs: Phyllis J. Hironaka, Deputy Public Defender, for Defendant-Appellant. Sonja P. McCullen, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, for Plaintiff-Appellee.


SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER

Affirm.


Summaries of

State v. Pattioay

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
May 8, 2018
416 P.3d 936 (Haw. Ct. App. 2018)

rejecting the defendant's argument that the trial court erred in "fail[ing] to instruct on the knowing and negligent states of mind," where the jury was properly instructed as to the applicable states of mind for terroristic threatening in the first degree — intentionally or recklessly

Summary of this case from State v. Valoroso
Case details for

State v. Pattioay

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthan PATTIOAY…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: May 8, 2018

Citations

416 P.3d 936 (Haw. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

State v. Valoroso

Indeed, this court has rejected similar arguments before. See, e.g., State v. Pattioay, No. CAAP-17-0000465,…