From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 30, 1980
384 So. 2d 790 (La. 1980)

Opinion

No. 66729.

May 30, 1980.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE ALVIN V. OSER, J.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty., Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., For Plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Barnard, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.


Defendant, and a Terrance Butler, were charged by bill of information with the armed robbery of one Suresh Chawla, in violation of R.S. 14:64. A second count in the information charged Butler alone with another armed robbery. On March 4, 1979, at counsel's request, the trial court severed Butler from defendant's case. After trial by jury on March 19, 1979, defendant was found guilty as charged. the state thereafter filed an information against him under the multiple offender provisions of R.S. 15:529.1. On September 21, 1979, the trial court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender "as to each of the two (2) counts which are to run concurrently, for one hundred years . . ." Defendant now appeals his conviction and sentence to this Court, urging that we review errors patent on the face of the record.

We affirm defendant's conviction. We note, however, that the trial judge evidently became confused by the original, two-count form of the information when he imposed two concurrent sentences for a single offense. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 872 Provides that "[a] valid sentence must rest upon a valid and sufficient . . . [v]erdict, judgment, or plea of guilty." La.C.Cr.P. Art. 872. A second, concurrent, one-hundred year sentences in this case is thus clearly illegal.

An illegal sentence may be vacated and corrected at any time. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 882; State v. Siegel, 354 So.2d 525 (La. 1978). Accordingly, while affirming defendant's conviction, we vacate his concurrent sentences to one-hundred years' imprisonment at hard labor, and remand to the trial court for resentencing and all proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCES VACATED AND CASE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.


Summaries of

State v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 30, 1980
384 So. 2d 790 (La. 1980)
Case details for

State v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BYRON PATTERSON

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 30, 1980

Citations

384 So. 2d 790 (La. 1980)

Citing Cases

State v. Wiggins

An illegal sentence may be vacated and corrected at any time. La. Code Crim.P. art. 882. State v. Patterson,…

State v. Smith

Accordingly, we find that the sentence imposed by the trial court of nine years at hard labor without benefit…