From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Patane

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jun 2, 1998
968 S.W.2d 267 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73087

Order Filed: June 2, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE GEORGE W. DRAPER III.

Thomas P. Howe, St. Louis, for Appellant.

John Quarenghi, Asst. Prosecuting Atty., Clayton, for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.



ORDER


Defendant Patricia Patane is appealing from the judgment entered after the trial court convicted her of misdemeanor stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1994. In her point on appeal, Defendant claims the trial court erred in limiting her cross-examination of Owner and excluding extrinsic evidence about illegal activities of Owner because this showed Owner's bias against Defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Patane

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jun 2, 1998
968 S.W.2d 267 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Patane

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. PATRICIA PATANE, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Jun 2, 1998

Citations

968 S.W.2d 267 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)