Opinion
ID #9312006327 (R-9)
02-03-2014
RE: State v. Daniel Paskins
RESIDENT JUDGE
N440 - State Mail
Mr. Daniel Paskins
SBI #203
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
1181 Paddock Road
Smyrna, DE 19977
Dear Mr. Paskins:
The Court is in receipt of your ninth Motion for Postconviction Relief filed pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.
In the present motion you allege you are somehow entitled to relief and a new trial because the wrong charges were read during your arraignment in 1994. You pled not guilty.
You have filed many challenges over the years claiming everything from ineffective counsel to this Court having no jurisdiction.
The present complaint has nothing to do with your conviction following a jury trial. It is frivolous.
This ninth motion is procedurally barred as it comes too late, is repetitive, and could have been raised earlier.
Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(1-3).
The motion is DENIED.
Very truly yours,
T. Henley Graves THG/ymp pc: Prothonotary
Department of Justice