From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Parham

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 26, 2019
587 S.W.3d 752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 82208

11-26-2019

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney Maurice PARHAM, Appellant.

Justin A. Moody, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Daniel E. Hunt, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.


Justin A. Moody, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Daniel E. Hunt, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.

Before Division One: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Rodney Parham appeals his conviction following a bench trial in the Cole County Circuit Court for the class D felony of possession of a controlled substance. He complains on appeal that the State of Missouri failed to present sufficient evidence that he was aware of the presence of the controlled substance and that he constructively possessed the controlled substance. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Parham

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 26, 2019
587 S.W.3d 752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Parham

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney Maurice PARHAM, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 26, 2019

Citations

587 S.W.3d 752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)