Opinion
1 CA-CR 22-0183 PRPC
11-22-2022
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. BRIAN JOHN PARDO, Petitioner.
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix By Desiree Michelle Kerfoot Counsel for Respondent Brian John Pardo, Kingman Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2015-002384-001 The Honorable Jay R. Adleman, Judge
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix By Desiree Michelle Kerfoot Counsel for Respondent
Brian John Pardo, Kingman Petitioner
Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr., and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
¶1 Petitioner Brian John Pardo seeks review of the superior court's order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction, response, and reply. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.