From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Panek

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2016
149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

09-20-2016

State of Connecticut v. John Panek

Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.


Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 613, 145 A.3d 924 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly construe the ‘not in plain view’ element of General Statutes § 53a–189a, the video voyeurism statute, in affirming the dismissal of charges against the defendant?”


Summaries of

State v. Panek

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2016
149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Panek

Case Details

Full title:State of Connecticut v. John Panek

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)
323 Conn. 911

Citing Cases

State v. Panek

We granted the state's petition for certification to appeal to address the following question: "Did the…